200 People Doing the Same Job 100 Different Ways.
Find your best practice. It's already happening somewhere.
200 People
Doing the Same Job
100 Different Ways.
Find your best practice. It's already happening somewhere.
The Scaling Problem
They want you to scale. To optimize. To standardize.
But what arrives at your desk is chaos dressed as process.
Every location does it differently.
Every shift has its own shortcuts.
Every veteran has "their way."
You can't scale what you can't see.
You can't standardize what changes by the person,
the shift, the mood.
They want you to scale. To optimize. To standardize.
But what arrives at your desk is chaos dressed as process.
Every location does it differently.
Every shift has its own shortcuts.
Every veteran has "their way."
You can't scale what you can't see.
You can't standardize what changes by the person,
the shift, the mood.
They want you to scale. To optimize. To standardize.
But what arrives at your desk is chaos dressed as process.
Every location does it differently.
Every shift has its own shortcuts.
Every veteran has "their way."
You can't scale what you can't see.
You can't standardize what changes by the person,
the shift, the mood.
What Voyager Shows You
Voyager observes how work actually flows.
Not the process map on the wall. The real one.
You'll see the variation between your best performers and everyone else. The steps people skip. The workarounds that became standard practice.
The bottlenecks nobody reported because they've always been there.
Voyager observes how work actually flows.
Not the process map on the wall. The real one.
You'll see the variation between your best performers and everyone else. The steps people skip. The workarounds that became standard practice.
The bottlenecks nobody reported because they've always been there.
Voyager observes how work actually flows.
Not the process map on the wall. The real one.
You'll see the variation between your best performers and everyone else. The steps people skip. The workarounds that became standard practice.
The bottlenecks nobody reported because they've always been there.
Find the Best Practice
That Already Exists
Somewhere in your operation, someone figured it out.
They're faster. More accurate. More efficient.
But their method lives in their head, invisible to everyone else.
Voyager finds them. Captures how they work. Documents what they do differently.
Now you can standardize on what actually works — not what a consultant theorized.
Somewhere in your operation, someone figured it out.
They're faster. More accurate. More efficient.
But their method lives in their head, invisible to everyone else.
Voyager finds them. Captures how they work. Documents what they do differently.
Now you can standardize on what actually works — not what a consultant theorized.
Somewhere in your operation, someone figured it out.
They're faster. More accurate. More efficient.
But their method lives in their head, invisible to everyone else.
Voyager finds them. Captures how they work. Documents what they do differently.
Now you can standardize on what actually works — not what a consultant theorized.
Bottlenecks You Can Finally Prove
Bottlenecks You Can
Finally Prove
You've suspected where work stalls. Now you'll know.
Voyager tracks wait times, handoff delays, queue buildups.
When you walk into the meeting and say "this step takes 3x longer than it should" — you'll have the evidence.
No more arguing with opinions. No more "that's just how it's always been."
You've suspected where work stalls. Now you'll know.
Voyager tracks wait times, handoff delays, queue buildups.
When you walk into the meeting and say "this step takes 3x longer than it should" — you'll have the evidence.
No more arguing with opinions. No more "that's just how it's always been."
You've suspected where work stalls. Now you'll know.
Voyager tracks wait times, handoff delays, queue buildups.
When you walk into the meeting and say "this step takes 3x longer than it should" — you'll have the evidence.
No more arguing with opinions. No more "that's just how it's always been."
What You'll See
What You'll See
Process variation across teams and locations
Bottleneck identification with time data
Handoff delays between steps and people
Best performer patterns vs. average
Workaround and shortcut detection
Actual cycle time vs. expected cycle time
Process variation across teams and locations
Bottleneck identification with time data
Handoff delays between steps and people
Best performer patterns vs. average
Workaround and shortcut detection
Actual cycle time vs. expected cycle time
Process variation across teams and locations
Bottleneck identification with time data
Handoff delays between steps and people
Best performer patterns vs. average
Workaround and shortcut detection
Actual cycle time vs. expected cycle time
Use Cases
Unlocked
Use Cases
Unlocked
Process documentation gap — See how work actually gets done vs. how it's documented
Workflow bottleneck detection — Where work stalls or queues or gets stuck between steps
Variance detection — Compare how different people do the same task
Best practice identification — Find what top performers do differently
Handoff failure detection — Where work falls through cracks between people and teams
Capacity planning evidence — Actual workload distribution before adding headcount
Process documentation gap — See how work actually gets done vs. how it's documented
Workflow bottleneck detection — Where work stalls or queues or gets stuck between steps
Variance detection — Compare how different people do the same task
Best practice identification — Find what top performers do differently
Handoff failure detection — Where work falls through cracks between people and teams
Capacity planning evidence — Actual workload distribution before adding headcount
Process documentation gap — See how work actually gets done vs. how it's documented
Workflow bottleneck detection — Where work stalls or queues or gets stuck between steps
Variance detection — Compare how different people do the same task
Best practice identification — Find what top performers do differently
Handoff failure detection — Where work falls through cracks between people and teams
Capacity planning evidence — Actual workload distribution before adding headcount
Other Perspectives
